Published document record

AI Act impact assessment: supporting study

PDF source copies

These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.

Official PDF — unmodified source copy
If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.
Download PDF — 205 pages (5.61 MB)
DOI 10.2759/523404; ISBN 978-92-76-36220-3. Final Report D5.
Source: European Commission. Retrieved 2026-09-10.
Copy provenance and reuse
Unmodified source PDF. Source attribution and original notices are retained; see the source reuse terms. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.
SHA-256: fd13a31573ada66b84011d855c7161327357aee1c0775c30095ba10cd7a3f373

Official metadata

Official title

Study to Support an Impact Assessment of Regulatory Requirements for Artificial Intelligence in Europe — Final Report (D5)

Official reference

DOI 10.2759/523404; ISBN 978-92-76-36220-3

Document type

Study

Document date

2021-04-21

Document date kind

Publication

Document-date evidence

European Commission · Commission library heading: Publication 21 April 2021, with link to document 75755. — Primary date is official publication; the PDF states manuscript completion only to April 2021 precision.

Publication date

2021-04-21

Publication-date evidence

European Commission · Publication 21 April 2021 and Download link to the exact Final Report D5 PDF. — Official publication of this study, not the date of the separate Commission impact assessment.

Additional official dates

Manuscript completion: 2021-04 (month) · European Commission · PDF p.4: manuscript completed in April 2021.

Version label

Final Report D5

Legal status

Non binding

Language

Research classifications

These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.

Record level

Principal

Version status

Final

Temporal collection

Contemporary EU AI policy

Relevance class

Direct AI relevance

Policy stage

Proposal

Corpus tier

Directly related

Sectors

Policy membership

Classification evidence

Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Commission · PDF pp.1–4 and Commission library description of the horizontal regulatory impact-assessment study. — Commission-commissioned study supporting the regulatory impact assessment of the AI Act proposal; not identical to SWD(2021)84 or SWD(2021)85.
Sector tags: General cross sector · European Commission · PDF pp.1–4 and Commission library description of the horizontal regulatory impact-assessment study. — The document addresses the cross-sector AI regulatory framework rather than a single application sector.
Provenance tags: EU commissioned external · European Commission · PDF pp.1–4: named external authors, Commission contract and prepared-for notice. — External authorship is retained separately from the Commission's commissioning role.
Provenance tags: Officially published · European Commission · Publication 21 April 2021 and Download link to the exact Final Report D5 PDF. — Exact official source provides the cited publication manifestation.

Production provenance

Provenance tags

Named bibliographic authors

Andrea Renda · CEPS · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Jane Arroyo · CEPS · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Rosanna Fanni · CEPS · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Moritz Laurer · CEPS · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Agnes Sipiczki · CEPS · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Timothy Yeung · CEPS · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
George Maridis · ICF · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Meena Fernandes · ICF · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Gabor Endrodi · ICF · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Simona Milio · ICF · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Vivien Devenyi · Wavestone · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Stefan Georgiev · Wavestone · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.
Ghislain de Pierrefeu · Wavestone · European Commission · PDF p.1: ordered Written by credits and affiliated organisations.

Institutions and roles

European Commission · Commissioner · role evidence · PDF pp.2 and 4: contract LC-01528103; prepared for the European Commission.
European Commission · Publisher · role evidence · Official Commission library publishes this study and its download.

Official sources and identifiers

Official source · Publisher/host: European Commission
Official source · Publisher/host: European Commission

Formal procedure

Official procedure reference:

2021/0106(COD)

Research assessment

Inclusion rationale: Commission-commissioned study supporting the regulatory impact assessment of the AI Act proposal; not identical to SWD(2021)84 or SWD(2021)85.
Researcher notes: PDF p.4 attributes views to the external authors; commissioning and publication do not imply Commission endorsement. Preserve April-only manuscript precision.
Review status: verified

Relationships

No additional published relationships touch this record.

Verification

Expanded evidence review: Verified

Reviewed by: Yichen Hao
Evidence review date: 2026-09-07T01:54:30Z

The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions

Last verified: 2026-09-07T01:54:30Z · Official source retrieved with Scrapling; retained evidence receipt c7a4e60d1716580f.json; raw SHA-256 eaa9ff95a9a07cda9e23efde7ae25ea4c21fb08057dcddc40051ac01f3e2cb7a. This is evidence verification, not a separate personal sign-off. Source receipts are archived in research/reviews/2026-09-07-ai-act-gaps/.
Last verified: 2026-09-07T01:54:30Z · Official source retrieved with Scrapling; retained evidence receipt resources/25d48e8203d7a672.json; raw SHA-256 fd13a31573ada66b84011d855c7161327357aee1c0775c30095ba10cd7a3f373. This is evidence verification, not a separate personal sign-off. Source receipts are archived in research/reviews/2026-09-07-ai-act-gaps/.

Return to the Corpus