Published relationships
Policy Map
Follow a policy process. Select a record to trace its recorded relationships.
Read the complete relationship list155 of 237 published document records have recorded relationships in this map. The remaining 82 records are available in Corpus. This is relationship coverage, not a measure of documentary importance or completeness; individual map filters show smaller subsets.
Preparing the map
Loading the published dataset…
The interactive map could not load. The complete relationship list remains available below.
Policy groupings are research classifications. They are not legal relationships.
Dates guide placement; this is not a proportional timeline. Arrow direction and relationship types come from the dataset. No relationship is inferred from proximity.
Relationship list
Complete published relationship list, independent of map filters.
AI Act consolidated text, 27 July 2026 · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. The ELI identifies this as the consolidated version of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 at 27 July 2026.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Council general-approach text · Version of → Coreper general-approach text
Official relationship. ST 14954/22 cites ST 14336/22 as the previous document and forwards the general-approach text to Council.
Council General Approach on the AI Act · Version of → Council general-approach text
Official relationship. ST 15698/22 records the Council outcome for the general-approach text submitted in ST 14954/22.
Council AI Act adoption note · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. ST 9645/1/24 REV 1 is the Council adoption note for 2021/0106(COD).
Council AI Act adoption statements · Annex to → Council AI Act adoption note
Official relationship. ST 9645/24 ADD 1 REV 2 is explicitly the statements addendum to the Council adoption note.
Coreper general-approach text · Revises → Final Council Presidency compromise
Official relationship. ST 14336/22 records changes against the final Presidency compromise ST 13955/22.
Final Council Presidency compromise · Revises → Fourth Council Presidency compromise
Official relationship. ST 13955/22 explicitly identifies changes from the fourth compromise ST 13102/22.
First consolidated Council Presidency compromise · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. ST 10069/22 identifies COM(2021) 206 as the Commission proposal and publishes the first consolidated Presidency compromise for the same procedure.
Fourth Council Presidency compromise · Revises → Third Council compromise, part two
Official relationship. ST 13102/22 explicitly presents changes against the third Presidency compromise completed by ST 12549/22.
German statement on the Council general approach · Annex to → Council general-approach text
Official relationship. The cover of ST 14954/22 ADD 1 identifies the attached German statement on the general approach.
Second Council Presidency compromise · Revises → First consolidated Council Presidency compromise
Official relationship. ST 11124/22 calls itself the second Presidency compromise and cites ST 10069/22 as the previous document.
Third Council compromise, part one — initial version · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. ST 12206/22 is a historical Presidency compromise version of the Commission proposal in procedure 2021/0106(COD).
Third Council compromise, part one · Revises → Third Council compromise, part one — initial version
Official relationship. The Council register returns separate ST 12206 2022 INIT and ST 12206 2022 REV 1 rows and labels Public 12206/1/22 as REV 1; this version edge does not resolve the INIT manifestation conflict.
Third Council compromise, part one · Revises → Second Council Presidency compromise
Official relationship. ST 12206/1/22 REV 1 introduction paragraph 7 identifies the changes made compared with the second compromise text in ST 11124/22.
Third Council compromise, part two · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. ST 12549/22 completes the third compromise of the proposal under 2021/0106(COD).
Annexes to the AI Act proposal impact assessment · Annex to → AI Act proposal impact assessment
Official relationship. The Council transmission record identifies the file as the annexes to the impact assessment SWD(2021) 84 final. Correction on 8 September 2026: direct inspection establishes ST 8115/21 ADD 2 as Part 1/2 (main assessment), and ADD 3 as Part 2/2 (annexes). The earlier ADD 2 identification above is superseded; historical review credits and timestamps are retained, not recertified. ADD 3 PDF pp.1-3 identifies the annex component.
Evidence source: European Commission / Council of the European Union
AI Act proposal impact assessment · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. EUR-Lex identifies SWD(2021) 84 final as the impact assessment accompanying COM(2021) 206 final under procedure 2021/0106(COD).
Executive summary of the AI Act proposal impact assessment · Part of → AI Act proposal impact assessment
Official relationship. The official title describes SWD(2021) 85 final as the executive summary of the impact assessment, and it cross-references SWD(2021) 84 final.
Executive summary of the AI Act proposal impact assessment · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. EUR-Lex identifies SWD(2021) 85 final as the executive summary accompanying COM(2021) 206 final under procedure 2021/0106(COD).
AI Act legislative-act text · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. PE-CONS 24/24 is the formal legislative-act text for the regulation later published as Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
AI Act signed legislative-act text · Revises → AI Act legislative-act text
Official relationship. The Council register labels the 13 June 2024 text PE-CONS 24/1/24 REV 1, revising PE-CONS 24/24.
AI Act signed legislative-act text · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. PE-CONS 24/1/24 REV 1 is the dated signed legislative-act version preceding the Official Journal manifestation of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
AI Act proceedings implementing regulation · Implements → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. The implementing regulation sets procedures for Commission action under the AI Act.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Annexes 1 to 9 to the AI Act proposal · Annex to → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The official PDF identifies Annexes 1 to 9 as annexes to COM(2021) 206 final.
Artificial Intelligence Act proposal · Based on → White Paper on Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. The explanatory memorandum to COM(2021) 206 identifies the 2020 White Paper and its consultation as the basis for the regulatory approach.
Artificial Intelligence Act proposal · Adopted as → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. The EUR-Lex procedure record identifies Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as the act adopted from COM(2021) 206 final under 2021/0106(COD).
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
AI Act provisional agreement text · Version of → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. ST 5662/24 publishes the final compromise of the proposal under 2021/0106(COD).
Regulatory Scrutiny Board opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The official SEC opinion identifies COM(2021) 206 and its supporting impact-assessment documents.
Evidence source: European Commission / Publications Office of the European Union
AI Board assessment of the GPAI Code · Endorses → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The AI Board assessment finds the code adequate under the AI Act process.
AI Board assessment of the Transparency Code · Endorses → AI-generated-content transparency code
Official relationship. The AI Board issued a separate adequacy assessment of the code.
Artificial Intelligence for Europe · Precedes → Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence
Analytical relationship. The coordination communication follows the 2018 Commission AI initiative within this selected chronological pathway.
AI Continent Action Plan annex · Annex to → AI Continent Action Plan
Official relationship. EUR-Lex publishes the file as the annex to COM(2025) 165 final.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Council Digital Omnibus adoption statements · Annex to → Council Digital Omnibus adoption note
Official relationship. ADD 1 is formally attached to ST 10752/26.
Greek statement on Digital Omnibus adoption · Annex to → Council Digital Omnibus adoption note
Official relationship. ADD 2 is formally attached to ST 10752/26.
Committee of the Regions opinion on digital simplification · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. The opinion concerns the Digital Omnibus proposal.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Council Digital Omnibus adoption note · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. ST 10752/26 is the Council I/A item note recommending approval of Parliament's first-reading position in procedure 2025/0359(COD); paragraphs 6–8 describe the contemplated adoption and publication conditionally.
ECB opinion CON/2026/10 · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. The opinion concerns COM(2025) 836 final.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
EDPB–EDPS Joint Opinion 1/2026 · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. Joint Opinion 1/2026 concerns COM(2025) 836 final.
Evidence source: European Data Protection Board and European Data Protection Supervisor
EESC opinion on the Digital Omnibus · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. The opinion concerns procedure 2025/0359(COD).
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Parliament first-reading position on the Digital Omnibus · Revises → Parliament amendments to the Digital Omnibus
Official relationship. The June first-reading position follows Parliament's March amendments in the same procedure.
European Parliament Digital Omnibus report · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. A10-0073/2026 is the Parliament committee report for 2025/0359(COD).
Signed Digital Omnibus legislative-act text · Revises → Digital Omnibus legislative-act text
Official relationship. PE-CONS 30/1/26 REV 1 is the revised signed text.
Digital Omnibus AI proposal · Adopted as → Digital Omnibus Regulation
Official relationship. Procedure 2025/0359(COD) culminated in Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Digital Omnibus Regulation · Amends → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 expressly amends Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Digital Omnibus staff working document · Procedural step for → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. SWD(2025) 836 accompanies COM(2025) 836 final.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Draft amendment to the high-risk AI standardisation request · Related to → Updated AI standardisation request
Official relationship. The notification cover and draft Article 1 explicitly identify C(2025)3871 as the proposed amendment's target. This records the stated connection only: the draft does not establish an operative amendment, replacement or supersession.
AI system definition guidelines · Implements → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. The guidelines expressly interpret the AI-system definition in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (ALTAI) · Based on → Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
Official relationship. The Commission page states that ALTAI translates the Ethics Guidelines' key requirements into a self-assessment checklist.
Apply AI Strategy annexes · Annex to → Apply AI Strategy
Official relationship. EUR-Lex publishes the files as annexes to COM(2025) 723 final.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence · Based on → Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
Official relationship. COM(2019) 168 launches the piloting phase for the ethical guidance prepared by the High-Level Expert Group on AI.
Skills empower workers in the AI revolution · Related to → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. Locator: PDF p.5, Policy background / Raising the bar for trustworthy artificial intelligence. The brief discusses the adopted AI Act as policy context for AI uptake and skills. This records that discussion, not a legal implementing instrument, a compliance assessment, or validation of each summary statement.
Evidence source: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
Skills empower workers in the AI revolution · Related to → Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027
Official relationship. Locator: PDF p.5, Policy background / Raising the bar for trustworthy artificial intelligence, paragraph linking digital infrastructure and skills goals to the digital education action plan. This is an explicit policy-context reference, not evidence that the brief is a mandated deliverable under the plan.
Evidence source: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
Commission opinion on the GPAI Code · Endorses → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The Commission opinion assesses the final code as adequate for the relevant AI Act obligations.
Commission opinion on the Transparency Code · Endorses → AI-generated-content transparency code
Official relationship. The Commission opinion assesses the code as adequate for demonstrating compliance with relevant Article 50 obligations.
Automated decision-making: consumer protection and free movement · Related to → Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. Locator: PDF p.1, introductory citation to COM(2019)0168 of 8 April 2019. This identifies the Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence communication as an explicitly referenced document, not as the same text or a binding legal basis.
Automated decision-making: consumer protection and free movement · Related to → Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. Locator: PDF p.1, introductory citation to COM(2018)0795 of 7 December 2018. The resolution cites the Commission communication on the Coordinated Plan; no implementing or amending relationship is asserted.
Automated decision-making: consumer protection and free movement · Related to → Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
Official relationship. Locator: PDF p.1, introductory citation naming Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, published on 8 April 2019. This records an explicit reference to the guidelines, not incorporation as binding requirements; the assessment list mentioned alongside them is not treated as a separate version here.
Automated decision-making: consumer protection and free movement · Related to → A comprehensive European industrial policy on AI and robotics
Official relationship. Locator: PDF p.1, first introductory citation and footnote 1 (P8_TA(2019)0081). The 2020 resolution explicitly cites the 2019 industrial-policy resolution. Citation does not establish that one document implements or supersedes the other.
2018 Coordinated Plan annex · Annex to → Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. The EUR-Lex text labels the coordinated plan as the annex to COM(2018) 795 final.
2021 review of the Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence · Annex to → Fostering a European approach to Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. The official PDF identifies the 2021 Coordinated Plan review as the annex to COM(2021) 205 final.
2021 review of the Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence · Revises → 2018 Coordinated Plan annex
Official relationship. The annex is explicitly titled the 2021 review of the Coordinated Plan first adopted in 2018.
European Committee of the Regions opinion on the AI Act · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. EUR-Lex links the revised Committee of the Regions opinion to procedure 2021/0106(COD).
Evidence source: European Committee of the Regions / EUR-Lex
Council coordinated AI plan: COREPER note and draft conclusions · Related to → Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. Locator: cover note paragraphs 1-5 and annex paragraph 1. The note records examination of the Commission communication and transmits draft conclusions on the 2018 coordinated plan. This links the procedural response to its subject; it does not treat the draft as an adopted final instrument or resolve its unknown publication date.
Draft high-risk classification guidelines — General principles · Part of → Draft high-risk classification guidelines — Complete consultation work
Official relationship. The Commission library expressly publishes this download as one separately supplied section of the complete consultation work. The parent is the real jointly published draft-guidelines work, not the prospective numbered Commission communication shown only as a placeholder on the section covers.
Draft Annex I high-risk classification guidelines · Part of → Draft high-risk classification guidelines — Complete consultation work
Official relationship. The Commission library expressly publishes this download as one separately supplied section of the complete consultation work. The parent is the real jointly published draft-guidelines work, not the prospective numbered Commission communication shown only as a placeholder on the section covers.
Draft Annex III high-risk classification guidelines · Part of → Draft high-risk classification guidelines — Complete consultation work
Official relationship. The Commission library expressly publishes this download as one separately supplied section of the complete consultation work. The parent is the real jointly published draft-guidelines work, not the prospective numbered Commission communication shown only as a placeholder on the section covers.
EASA Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper Issue 2: Guidance for Level 1 & 2 machine-learning applications · Implements → EASA Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation
Official relationship. Final concept paper, printed pp.4-6, identifies itself as a deliverable under Roadmap 2.0.
EASA Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper Issue 2: Guidance for Level 1 & 2 machine-learning applications · Revises → EASA Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper: Guidance for Level 1 & 2 machine learning applications — Proposed Issue 02
Official relationship. Published Issue 02 follows the public consultation on Proposed Issue 02. Final release acknowledges that consultation; exact issue identity is corroborated by both document headers.
EASA Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper: Guidance for Level 1 & 2 machine learning applications — Proposed Issue 02 · Implements → EASA Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 1.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation
Official relationship. Proposed concept paper, printed p.4 Foreword, expressly implements the first two Phase I milestones of Roadmap 1.0.
EASA Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation · Revises → EASA Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 1.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation
Official relationship. Roadmap 2.0 p.5 explicitly updates the earlier Roadmap 1.0; p.34 reference [1] identifies it.
EBA Discussion Paper on machine learning for IRB models · Based on → EBA Report on Big Data and Advanced Analytics
Official relationship. Discussion paper p.7 Introduction explicitly builds on the 13 January 2020 BD&AA report and its ML framing.
Machine Learning for IRB Models: Follow-up report from the consultation on the Discussion Paper on machine learning for IRB models · Based on → EBA Discussion Paper on machine learning for IRB models
Official relationship. Follow-up report pp.3-5 summarises consultation on the 11 November 2021 discussion paper and retains/refines its recommendations.
ECB opinion CON/2021/40 on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. EUR-Lex links CON/2021/40 to procedure 2021/0106(COD) and identifies the proposal addressed.
ECB technical working document for CON/2026/10 · Annex to → ECB opinion CON/2026/10
Analytical relationship. The annex_to type analytically models the TWD as a separate companion to CON/2026/10; the official heading and footnote establish the connection but do not say the five-page file is literally annexed inside the authentic OJ opinion.
Evidence source: European Central Bank / Publications Office of the European Union
EDPB–EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021 · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The official joint opinion title identifies the AI Act proposal as its subject.
Evidence source: European Data Protection Board and European Data Protection Supervisor
Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027 · Related to → Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
Official relationship. Locator: section 4.1, action 6, printed p.12 (PDF p.13), footnote 21. The planned educational guidance on AI and data use is stated to build on the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. The relationship is limited to that action; the whole action plan is not a version of the guidelines or an implementation of the later AI Act.
EESC opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The official opinion identifies COM(2021) 206 final and procedure 2021/0106(COD).
Evidence source: European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex
EESC opinion on the 2021 coordinated plan · Based on → Fostering a European approach to Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. The official EESC opinion identifies COM(2021) 205 final as the communication on which it comments.
Evidence source: European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex
Reflection paper on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the medicinal product lifecycle · Revises → Draft reflection paper on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the medicinal product lifecycle
Official relationship. EMA guideline page separates adopted Current version and 2023 consultation draft under Document history, sharing reference EMA/CHMP/CVMP/83833/2023.
Parliament amendments on the AI Act, June 2023 · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The adopted text explicitly identifies COM(2021) 206 and procedure 2021/0106(COD).
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Parliament first-reading position on the AI Act · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The legislative resolution is Parliament's first-reading position in 2021/0106(COD).
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Parliament first-reading position on the AI Act · Revises → Parliament amendments on the AI Act, June 2023
Official relationship. Parliament's first-reading text states that it replaces the amendments adopted on 14 June 2023.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Joint IMCO-LIBE report on the AI Act · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. A9-0188/2023 identifies COM(2021) 206 and procedure 2021/0106(COD).
Joint IMCO-LIBE report on the AI Act · Revises → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure chronology records A9-0188/2023 as the adopted committee report following PE731.563.
AI Act committee amendments 310 - 538 - (PE732.802) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 310 - 538 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 539 - 773 - (PE732.836) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 539 - 773 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 774 - 1189 - (PE732.837) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 774 - 1189 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 1190 - 1580 - (PE732.838) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 1190 - 1580 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 1581 - 2005 - (PE732.839) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 1581 - 2005 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 2006 - 2355 - (PE732.840) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 2006 - 2355 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 2356 - 2726 - (PE732.841) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 2356 - 2726 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 2727 - 3019 - (PE732.843) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 2727 - 3019 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
AI Act committee amendments 3020 - 3312 - (PE732.844) · Procedural step for → Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act
Official relationship. The cover identifies amendments 3020 - 3312 - to draft report PE731.563v01-00; API foresees_change_of points to CJ40-PR-731563. This relationship records the proposed procedural step, not an enacted amendment or adoption.
CULT opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure file lists PE719.637 as CULT's opinion for 2021/0106(COD).
Joint IMCO-LIBE draft report on the AI Act · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure file lists PE731.563 as the joint draft report for 2021/0106(COD).
ENVI opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure file lists PE699.056 as ENVI's opinion for 2021/0106(COD).
ITRE opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure file lists PE719.801 as ITRE's opinion for 2021/0106(COD).
JURI opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure file lists PE719.827 as JURI's opinion for 2021/0106(COD).
TRAN opinion on the AI Act proposal · Procedural step for → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Official relationship. The Parliament procedure file lists PE730.085 as TRAN's opinion for 2021/0106(COD).
Committee report on AI in education, culture and audiovisual media · Procedural step for → AI in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
Official relationship. The official report page separately lists this committee report under Texts tabled and the linked plenary resolution under Texts adopted. This does not assert identical text.
Committee report on intellectual property rights and AI · Procedural step for → Intellectual property rights and AI technologies
Official relationship. The official report page separately lists this committee report under Texts tabled and the linked plenary resolution under Texts adopted. This does not assert identical text.
Omnibus: committee amendments 25–170 · Based on → Omnibus: IMCO/LIBE draft report
Official relationship. English Word cover, dated 14.2.2026: amendments 25-170, draft report PE782.530v01-00 and procedure 2025/0359(COD). The cover explicitly identifies PE782.530v01-00 as the draft report being amended.
Omnibus: committee amendments 171–317 · Based on → Omnibus: IMCO/LIBE draft report
Official relationship. English Word cover, dated 14.2.2026: amendments 171-317, draft report PE782.530v01-00 and procedure 2025/0359(COD). The cover explicitly identifies PE782.530v01-00 as the draft report being amended.
Omnibus: committee amendments 318–450 · Based on → Omnibus: IMCO/LIBE draft report
Official relationship. English Word cover, dated 14.2.2026: amendments 318-450, draft report PE782.530v01-00 and procedure 2025/0359(COD). The cover explicitly identifies PE782.530v01-00 as the draft report being amended.
Omnibus: IMCO/LIBE draft report · Based on → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. English Word cover: DRAFT REPORT, 5.2.2026, IMCO/LIBE, rapporteurs Arba Kokalari and Michael McNamara; amendments 1-24 and explanatory statement. The cover/subject or Legislative proposal section explicitly cites COM(2025)0836.
TRAN opinion on the Digital Omnibus · Based on → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. English Word letter dated 18.3.2026; opening paragraph states TRAN adopted the opinion at its meeting of 18 March 2026. The cover/subject or Legislative proposal section explicitly cites COM(2025)0836.
Digital Omnibus on AI: EPRS briefing · Based on → Digital Omnibus AI proposal
Official relationship. PDF p.1: EPRS, Author Maria Niestadt, PE782.651 – June 2026; current Think Tank card: Briefing 16-06-2026. The cover/subject or Legislative proposal section explicitly cites COM(2025)0836.
Article 50 transparency guidelines · Annex to → Approval communication for Article 50 guidelines
Official relationship. The exact 131215 cover identifies the guidelines as the annex to the C(2026) 5054 communication approving their content.
Article 50 transparency guidelines · Revises → Draft Article 50 transparency guidelines
Official relationship. Paragraph 4 of the 20 July 2026 C(2026) 5054 annex states that drafting was informed by stakeholder input on the guidelines published for consultation. The target is the Commission's 8 May 2026 consultation draft of the same Article 50 guidelines; the source is the later content-approved draft annex, not a claim of formal adoption.
AI in science — Scientific Opinion No. 15 (corrected) · Revises → AI in science — Scientific Opinion No. 15 (first edition)
Analytical relationship. The official corrected PDF cover and p.2 explicitly label a corrected first edition, with the same Scientific Opinion No. 15 identity and 27 March 2024 issue date. Researcher comparison against the two preserved original first-edition copies (ALLEA and KNAW, linked from the parent record) establishes an original-to-corrected relationship: all 102 corresponding pages were text-extracted, with non-whitespace differences on 22 page pairs and inspected wording changes on PDF pp.13,27,34. This is an analytical inference from the official correction label plus original-content comparison, not a publisher-issued errata schedule, an assertion of typography-only changes, or an explanation of why each edit was made.
GPAI Code copyright chapter · Part of → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The Commission landing page presents Copyright as one of the final code's three chapters, so this component is represented as part of the final code.
GPAI Code of Practice · Revises → GPAI Code third draft
Official relationship. The final code follows the third consultation draft.
GPAI Code safety and security chapter · Part of → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The Commission landing page presents Safety and Security as one of the final code's three chapters, so this component is represented as part of the final code.
GPAI Code transparency chapter · Part of → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The Commission landing page presents Transparency as one of the final code's three chapters, so this component is represented as part of the final code.
GPAI Code model documentation form · Related to → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The Commission landing page states that the model-documentation form supports the Transparency chapter; related_to conservatively represents that purpose without asserting a stronger unverified binary structure.
GPAI Code second draft · Revises → GPAI Code first draft
Official relationship. The official process labels this publication the second draft.
GPAI Code signatory form · Related to → GPAI Code of Practice
Official relationship. The Commission landing page establishes the form's administrative signing purpose; related_to conservatively represents that role without asserting a stronger unverified binary structure.
GPAI Code third-draft commitments · Part of → GPAI Code third draft
Official relationship. The Commission landing page describes the commitments and three chapters as the structure of the third draft, so the commitments component is represented as part of the third draft.
GPAI Code third-draft copyright chapter · Part of → GPAI Code third draft
Official relationship. The Commission landing page describes the commitments and three chapters as the structure of the third draft, so the Copyright component is represented as part of the third draft.
GPAI Code third draft · Revises → GPAI Code second draft
Official relationship. The official process labels this publication the third draft.
GPAI Code third-draft safety and security chapter · Part of → GPAI Code third draft
Official relationship. The Commission landing page describes the commitments and three chapters as the structure of the third draft, so the Safety and Security component is represented as part of the third draft.
GPAI Code third-draft transparency chapter · Part of → GPAI Code third draft
Official relationship. The Commission landing page describes the commitments and three chapters as the structure of the third draft, so the Transparency component is represented as part of the third draft.
Guidelines for GPAI model providers · Annex to → Approval communication for GPAI guidelines
Official relationship. The July annex cover identifies the parent communication, whose page 2 approves the content of the enclosed draft guidelines while deferring formal adoption.
Guidelines for GPAI model providers · Implements → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. Original July annex paragraphs 7-10 clarify and operationalise obligations for GPAI model providers under the AI Act without legally amending it.
Draft Annex I high-risk classification guidelines · Related to → Draft high-risk classification guidelines — General principles
Analytical relationship. The Commission landing page presents this file and the General-principles file as sibling sections of one draft guideline, not versions or annexes of the General-principles file; related_to records association only and does not establish parent readiness.
Draft Annex III high-risk classification guidelines · Related to → Draft high-risk classification guidelines — General principles
Analytical relationship. The Commission landing page presents this file and the General-principles file as sibling sections of one draft guideline, not versions or annexes of the General-principles file; related_to records association only and does not establish parent readiness.
ESPRIT 1984 work programme · Implements → ESPRIT I
Official relationship. Preamble cites Article 3(2) of Decision 84/130/EEC; Article 1 adopts the annual programme.
Evidence source: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
ESPRIT 1985 work programme · Implements → ESPRIT I
Official relationship. Preamble cites Article 3(2) of Decision 84/130/EEC; Article 1 adopts the annual programme.
Evidence source: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
FP6 Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area · Implements → Sixth Framework Programme (FP6)
Official relationship. Recitals 1–2 identify implementation of Decision 1513/2002/EC.
Evidence source: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
HLEG sectoral considerations · Based on → HLEG policy and investment recommendations
Official relationship. Printed pp.3-4 explicitly describe applying the 2019 recommendations in sector workshops; this is a separate deliverable, not a replacement version.
NDSG workplan 2026-2028 (v2.0) · Revises → NDSG workplan 2025-2028 (v1.4)
Official relationship. EMA NDSG catalogue Workplan/Previous versions panels link the 2026-2028 v2.0 workplan to the hosted previous 2025-2028 v1.4 manifestation. The v2.0 Introduction p.4 explicitly calls it the first annual revision. This evidences the revision relationship to the hosted previous version, without asserting recovery of earlier v1.0-v1.3 manifestations.
Horizon Europe specific programme · Replaces → Horizon 2020 specific programme
Official relationship. Decision2021/764 establishes the successor programme and expressly repeals Decision2013/743 in Article15; Article16 preserves existing actions until closure. Replacement does not mean every existing action terminated.
A comprehensive European industrial policy on AI and robotics · Endorses → Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. Locator: paragraph 182. The resolution explicitly welcomes the Commission Coordinated Plan published on 7 December 2018. This records expressed parliamentary support, not legal adoption or incorporation of the plan.
A comprehensive European industrial policy on AI and robotics · Related to → Civil Law Rules on Robotics
Official relationship. Locator: first introductory citation and recital N. The resolution explicitly refers to the Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. This is a documentary reference, not an amendment, replacement or causal claim.
Robustness and explainability of artificial intelligence · Related to → Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence
Official relationship. Locator: section 2.1, printed pp.6-7 (PDF pp.10-11), and reference [24], printed p.27. The technical report discusses the 2018 coordinated plan and identifies COM(2018)795 final in its references. This is policy-background discussion, not proof of implementation or legislative influence.
Robustness and explainability of artificial intelligence · Related to → Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
Official relationship. Locator: section 2.1, printed p.7 (PDF p.11), HLEG discussion citing [25,26]; reference [26], printed p.27, names Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. This records an explicit documentary reference, not endorsement of every recommendation or a causal contribution to later legislation.
AI Watch: defining artificial intelligence 2.0 · Revises → AI Watch: defining artificial intelligence
Official relationship. Second-edition PDF p.8 explicitly builds on the February 2020 first report and extends the definition and taxonomy, including the AI Act proposal.
JURI report on Civil Law Rules on Robotics · Procedural step for → Civil Law Rules on Robotics
Official relationship. OEIL 2015/2103(INL), key events and documentation gateway, list report A8-0005/2017 tabled 27 January 2017 before the resolution adopted 16 February 2017. The resolution preamble explicitly cites A8-0005/2017. They are distinct procedural texts; the report includes an explanatory statement and six embedded opinions.
Prohibited AI practices guidelines · Implements → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. The guidelines expressly address prohibited practices under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
Scientific panel implementing regulation · Implements → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. The implementing regulation is adopted under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
Evidence source: Publications Office of the European Union / EUR-Lex
Updated AI standardisation request · Implements → Artificial Intelligence Act
Official relationship. C(2025) 3871 requests standards in support of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
Updated AI standardisation request · Supersedes → AI standardisation request M/593
Official relationship. The 2025 decision expressly repeals C(2023) 3215.
AI-generated-content transparency code · Revises → AI-generated-content transparency code second draft
Official relationship. The final code follows the second consultation draft.
AI-generated-content transparency code second draft · Revises → AI-generated-content transparency code first draft
Official relationship. The official process labels this publication the second draft.
Transparency Code signatory form · Related to → AI-generated-content transparency code
Official relationship. The Commission landing page establishes the form's administrative signing purpose for the final Transparency Code; related_to conservatively represents that role without asserting a stronger unverified binary structure.
White Paper on Artificial Intelligence · Precedes → Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Analytical relationship. The White Paper's discussion of a future regulatory framework precedes the Commission's 2021 legislative proposal in this research pathway.