Published document record
EESC opinion on the AI Act proposal
PDF source copies
These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.
Official PDF — unmodified source copy
If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.
Download PDF — 6 pages (1.89 MB)EESC 2021/02482. English PDF, 6 pages. EESC opinion, OJ 2021/C 517/09, pages 56-61.
Source: European Economic and Social Committee. Retrieved 2026-09-10.
Copy provenance and reuse
Unmodified official document. Source attribution and original notices are retained. EUR-Lex permits reuse of legal documents unless a specific restriction applies; this copy is not relicensed as database metadata. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.
SHA-256:
872ca0c9d3370d02758efacb60323fa198977b9da73197c9dcb3ca786fd40eca
Official metadata
- Official title
- Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts’ (COM(2021) 206 final — 2021/106 (COD))
- Official reference
- EESC 2021/02482
- Document type
- Opinion
- Document date
- 2021-09-22
- Document date kind
- Institutional adoption
- Document-date evidence
- European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · EUR-Lex Document information > Date of document and Date of vote: 22/09/2021 for EESC 2021/02482. — Establishes retained document date 2021-09-22.
- Publication date
- 2021-12-22
- Publication-date evidence
- European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · OJ C 517, 22.12.2021, pp. 61-66. — Establishes retained publication date 2021-12-22 separately from issue, vote, adoption, or signature.
- Version label
- Adopted opinion
- Legal status
- Non binding
- Language
- en
Research classifications
These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.
- Record level
- Supporting
- Version status
- Final
- Temporal collection
- Contemporary EU AI policy
- Relevance class
- Direct AI relevance
- Policy stage
- Negotiation
- Corpus tier
- Core
- Sectors
- Policy membership
Classification evidence
- Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · Official EESC 2021/02482: sections 3-4 assess COM(2021) 206 for workers, consumers, enterprises, public services and fundamental-rights uses. — The cited provisions make AI the central subject.
- Sector tags: General cross sector · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · Official EESC 2021/02482: sections 3-4 assess COM(2021) 206 for workers, consumers, enterprises, public services and fundamental-rights uses. — The cited provisions substantiate the retained cross-sector classification.
- Provenance tags: Authored by an EU agency or body · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · EUR-Lex Document information > Author: European Economic and Social Committee; EESC 2021/02482 opinion heading names the Committee. — Exact official metadata identifies the responsible EU institution or body.
- Provenance tags: Officially published · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · OJ C 517, 22.12.2021, pp. 61-66. — The official EU manifestation independently establishes publication of this exact record.
- Sector tags: Health · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.12, diagnostic/prognostic tools. — Recommends broader safeguards for medical AI.
- Sector tags: Critical infrastructure · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.15, telecom/internet infrastructure. — Recommends extending high-risk AI coverage.
- Sector tags: Education · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.16, admission/evaluation and proctoring. — Analyses educational AI risks.
- Sector tags: Employment and labour · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.17-4.18, worker monitoring/oversight. — Recommends workplace participation and safeguards.
- Sector tags: Public administration · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.19, public-service access. — Compares AI service-eligibility coverage.
- Sector tags: Financial services · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.19, creditworthiness scoring. — Analyses financial-service AI coverage.
- Sector tags: Law enforcement · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.20, individual risk assessment. — Critiques AI-based criminal-risk inference.
- Sector tags: Migration asylum and border management · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.20, asylum/border risk assessment. — Analyses AI risks to asylum rights.
- Sector tags: Justice · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · 4.21, judicial decision-making. — Critiques limits of AI-assisted judging.
- Sector tags: Consumer protection · European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex · Sections 4.6-4.8 and 4.19. — Critiques biometric assessment in shops and recommends safeguards for access to essential private services.
Production provenance
- Provenance tags
- Named bibliographic authors
- None recorded after review
- Institutions and roles
-
- European Economic and Social Committee · Author · role evidence · EUR-Lex Document information > Author: European Economic and Social Committee; EESC 2021/02482 opinion heading names the Committee.
Official sources and identifiers
- CELEX
- 52021AE2482
- OJ reference
- OJ C 517, 22.12.2021, pp. 61–66 (2021/C 517/09)
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Economic and Social Committee / EUR-Lex
Formal procedure
Official procedure reference:
- 2021/0106(COD)
Parent or principal record
-
Parent or principal record: Artificial Intelligence Act proposal
Procedural step for · Official relationship · Verified
Research assessment
- Inclusion rationale
- The mandatory EESC opinion is a formal institutional contribution to procedure 2021/0106(COD).
- Researcher notes
- EUR-Lex assigns this AI Act proposal opinion 2021/C 517/09, not 2021/C 517/08; the latter is the separate opinion on COM(2021) 205.
- Review status
- verified
Relationships
No additional published relationships touch this record.
Verification
- Expanded evidence review
- Verified
- Reviewed by
- Yichen Hao
- Evidence review date
- 2026-09-05T18:06:34Z
The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions
- Last verified: 2026-09-04T00:00:00Z · EUR-Lex confirms CELEX 52021AE2482, EESC 2021/02482, adoption on 22 September 2021 and OJ reference 2021/C 517/09.