EU AI Policy Observatory

Published document record

Digital Omnibus on AI: EPRS briefing

Official metadata

Official title
Digital Omnibus on AI
Official reference
EPRS_BRI(2026)782651; PE782.651
Document type
Briefing
Document date
2026-06-16
Document date kind
Publication
Document-date evidence
European Parliament · PDF p.1: EPRS, Author Maria Niestadt, PE782.651 – June 2026; current Think Tank card: Briefing 16-06-2026. — Day-level publication date of the current June edition; not a February issue date.
Publication date
2026-06-16
Publication-date evidence
European Parliament · Official English document card date 2026-06-16 and direct link to the retained PDF manifestation. — Official catalogue publication date for the cited manifestation; not a claim of first-ever availability.
Additional official dates
Version label
June 2026 edition
Legal status
Non binding
Language
en

Research classifications

These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.

Record level
Supporting
Version status
Revised
Temporal collection
Contemporary EU AI policy
Relevance class
Direct AI relevance
Policy stage
Negotiation
Corpus tier
Directly related
Sectors
  • General cross sector
  • Health
  • Migration asylum and border management
  • Financial services
  • Transport and mobility
  • Law enforcement
  • Education
  • Consumer protection
  • Media and culture
  • Research and innovation
  • Industry and manufacturing
Policy membership
  • Digital Omnibus
  • EU AI policy pathway

Classification evidence

  • Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Parliament · PDF p.1: EPRS, Author Maria Niestadt, PE782.651 – June 2026; current Think Tank card: Briefing 16-06-2026. — The text concerns substantive amendment of the AI Act in procedure 2025/0359(COD).
  • Sector tags: General cross sector · European Parliament · PDF p.1 Context and Legislative proposal: horizontal AI Act amendment package. — The identified passage directly addresses this policy domain; this is a research classification, not an official controlled-vocabulary assignment.
  • Sector tags: Transport and mobility · European Parliament · PDF p.1 Context: proposed amendments to the civil aviation Basic Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its high-risk AI requirements. — The identified passage directly addresses this policy domain; this is a research classification, not an official controlled-vocabulary assignment.
  • Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · European Parliament · PDF p.1: EPRS, Author Maria Niestadt, PE782.651 – June 2026; current Think Tank card: Briefing 16-06-2026. — EPRS institutional research output with a separately named author; not an official Parliament policy position.
  • Provenance tags: Officially published · European Parliament · Official Parliament card links this exact English manifestation. — The official institutional publication channel establishes public availability.
  • Sector tags: Research and innovation · European Parliament · PE782.651, June 2026 edition, PDF p.3 AI regulatory sandboxes bullet and p.6 EDPB/EDPS and think-tank discussion. — Discusses expanded real-world AI testing, an EU-level sandbox and data-protection authority involvement, with attributed views on innovation safeguards. The tag is not inferred merely from the document being a research briefing.
  • Sector tags: Education · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.3 AI literacy bullet, p.6 stakeholder discussion and p.7 committee-report account. — Compares proposed changes and stakeholder positions on AI literacy for staff and society. The briefing's descriptions of successive negotiating positions are not combined into a single enacted rule.
  • Sector tags: Media and culture · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.3 Generative AI marking bullet and pp.7-8 negotiation and stakeholder accounts. — Discusses marking AI-generated content, proposed prohibitions concerning non-consensual synthetic intimate content and differing transitional periods. The source is an attributed legislative briefing, not independently established current law.
  • Sector tags: Consumer protection · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.6 BEUC paragraph and p.8 BEUC response to the trilogue agreement. — Substantively reports consumer-organisation concerns about delayed safeguards, registration removal and the treatment of machinery, medical devices and toys. The coding describes the debate; it does not endorse or independently verify the advocacy claims.
  • Sector tags: Health · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.6 Standing Committee of European Doctors paragraph and p.8 medical-device discussion. — Reports concerns about AI safeguards in medical-device regulation and differing stakeholder reactions to the treatment of medical devices. The tag rests on a concrete healthcare product domain, not generic references to safety.
  • Sector tags: Industry and manufacturing · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.7 final paragraph and p.8 machinery-product discussion. — Explains the reported machinery-specific approach to high-risk AI and requirements relating to safety components, alongside stakeholder reactions. Reported negotiation outcomes are not substituted for the final legal instrument.
  • Sector tags: Financial services · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF pp.3-4 Parliament's prior position and p.7 Council general-approach account. — Discusses AI Act implementation inconsistencies in the financial sector and proposed retention of national supervisory responsibility for financial institutions. This does not classify generic financing or administrative-cost figures as financial-services applications.
  • Sector tags: Law enforcement · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.7 Council general-approach account, first substantive paragraph. — Reports the Council's suggested retention of national-authority responsibility for AI supervision in law enforcement. This is a specific institutional-competence treatment, not a claim about all law-enforcement uses or final law.
  • Sector tags: Migration asylum and border management · European Parliament · PE782.651, PDF p.7 Council general-approach account, first substantive paragraph. — Reports the Council's suggested retention of national-authority responsibility for AI supervision in border management. The combined tag is supported by border management, not a claim that asylum and migration uses are also analysed.

Production provenance

Provenance tags
  • Authored by an EU institution
  • Officially published
Named bibliographic authors
  • Maria Niestadt · European Parliamentary Research Service · European Parliament · PDF p.1 author credit; p.9 author-responsibility disclaimer.
Institutions and roles

Official sources and identifiers

Formal procedure

Official procedure reference:

  • 2025/0359(COD)

Research assessment

Inclusion rationale
A distinct official research briefing documenting the Digital Omnibus on AI procedure and proposed changes to the AI Act.
Researcher notes
This record describes the recovered June 2026 edition, not the unrecovered manifestation behind the February OEIL entry. The current card supplies the day-level publication date; the PDF identifies only June 2026. PDF p.9 states that the content is the author's responsibility and does not represent Parliament's official position. No official legislative position or independently verified February-to-June revision relationship is inferred.
Review status
verified

Relationships

Verification

Expanded evidence review
Verified
Reviewed by
Yichen Hao
Evidence review date
2026-09-07T02:40:57Z

The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions

  • Last verified: 2026-09-07T02:40:57Z · Official English document card retrieved and inspected. Original bytes retained at research/reviews/2026-09-07-six-ep-admissions/archives/ep-gap-782651-card.html.gz; SHA-256 4fdd9c823ad3d0b1b32576fe3f08187bc5ee5532a87425e3b8baa7f3d5d3d32f. Evidence review is not a separate personal sign-off.
  • Last verified: 2026-09-07T02:40:57Z · Official English PDF full text retrieved and inspected. Original bytes retained at research/reviews/2026-09-07-six-ep-admissions/archives/ep-gap-782651-fulltext.pdf.gz; SHA-256 79f9b88c225e170f6e62ec513e87c0543b01bd9592ac0c654602aa8e52fc8c53. Evidence review is not a separate personal sign-off.

Return to the Corpus