Published document record
Draft Annex III high-risk classification guidelines
PDF source copies
These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.
Official PDF — unmodified source copy
If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.
Download PDF — 148 pages (1.48 MB)Draft Annex III high-risk classification guidelines. Consultation draft — Annex III.
Source: European Commission. Retrieved 2026-09-10.
Copy provenance and reuse
Unmodified source PDF. Source attribution and original notices are retained; see the source reuse terms. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.
SHA-256:
b1df0ffb30310e126c7e060e03c9b5aab97c0a2ab61a2f3e3e00ede3655e2792
Official metadata
- Official title
- Draft Commission Guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems — Annex III systems
- Document type
- Guidelines
- Document date
- 2026-05-19
- Document date kind
- Publication
- Document-date evidence
- European Commission · Publication 19 May 2026; paragraph immediately above Downloads; Downloads 1-3. — Establishes 2026-05-19 as the publication date of the shared consultation work and this separately supplied Annex III systems section.
- Publication date
- 2026-05-19
- Publication-date evidence
- European Commission · Publication 19 May 2026; paragraph immediately above Downloads; Downloads 1-3. — Establishes official Commission publication of this section on 2026-05-19, not formal adoption of a numbered communication.
- Version label
- Consultation draft — Annex III
- Legal status
- Non binding
- Legal-status evidence
- European Commission · PDF pages 1-4 identify the section as draft guidelines and include the consultation draft disclaimer. — Supports the retained draft version and non-binding status without inferring a reference or adoption from cover placeholders.
- Language
- en
Research classifications
These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.
- Record level
- Attachment
- Version status
- Draft
- Temporal collection
- Contemporary EU AI policy
- Relevance class
- Direct AI relevance
- Policy stage
- Consultation
- Corpus tier
- Core
- Sectors
- Policy membership
Classification evidence
- Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Commission · PDF pages 2-4 contents and Section IV body address Article 6(2) and the AI Act Annex III high-risk use cases. — The section directly interprets substantive AI Act high-risk classification.
- Sector tags: General cross sector · European Commission · PDF pages 2-4 contents enumerate Annex III use cases across infrastructure, education, employment, services, enforcement, migration and justice. — The section spans the full horizontal Annex III taxonomy.
- Sector tags: Critical infrastructure · European Commission · Section IV.3.2, printed pages 38-47. — The body expressly covers critical infrastructure high-risk use cases.
- Sector tags: Transport and mobility · European Commission · Section IV.3.2.3, printed pages 42-43, road-traffic use case. — The critical-infrastructure discussion expressly covers road traffic.
- Sector tags: Education · European Commission · Section IV.3.3, printed pages 48-59. — The body expressly covers education and vocational-training use cases.
- Sector tags: Employment and labour · European Commission · Section IV.3.4, printed pages 60-77. — The body expressly covers employment and worker-management use cases.
- Sector tags: Public administration · European Commission · Section IV.3.5.2, printed pages 79-84, public-assistance benefits and services. — The body expressly covers public-authority delivery of essential assistance.
- Sector tags: Financial services · European Commission · Sections IV.3.5.3-IV.3.5.5, printed pages 85-93, creditworthiness and insurance. — The body expressly covers credit and insurance decisions.
- Sector tags: Health · European Commission · Sections IV.3.5.4 and IV.3.5.6, printed pages 89-91 and 94-98, health insurance and emergency services. — The body expressly covers health-insurance and emergency-service use cases.
- Sector tags: Law enforcement · European Commission · Section IV.3.6, printed pages 99-115. — The body expressly covers law-enforcement use cases.
- Sector tags: Migration asylum and border management · European Commission · Section IV.3.7, printed pages 116-129. — The body expressly covers migration, asylum and border-management use cases.
- Sector tags: Justice · European Commission · Section IV.3.8, administration of justice and democratic processes. — The body expressly covers administration-of-justice use cases.
- Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · European Commission · PDF page 1 cover carries the European Commission masthead. — The exact section is authored by the European Commission.
- Provenance tags: Official consultation material · European Commission · Official library publication dated 19 May 2026 presents the Annex III systems download as a section of the draft consultation guidelines. — The Commission issued the section for the targeted consultation.
- Provenance tags: Officially published · European Commission · Official library Publication 19 May 2026 and Downloads 1-3. — The Commission library officially publishes this section.
Production provenance
- Provenance tags
- Named bibliographic authors
- None recorded after review
- Institutions and roles
-
- European Commission · Author · role evidence · PDF page 1 cover carries the European Commission masthead for this Annex III systems section.
Official sources and identifiers
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Commission
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Commission
Parent or principal record
-
Parent or principal record: Draft high-risk classification guidelines — Complete consultation work
Part of · Official relationship · Verified
Research assessment
- Inclusion rationale
- Verified official English text within the AI Act implementation and amendment corpus.
- Researcher notes
- Official metadata is transcribed from the cited source; corpus tier and policy-stage classification are researcher assessments. Subsequent file-level review by AI-assisted reviewer at 2026-09-05T08:20:53Z: retrieved official PDF 128561 and recorded its real SHA-256 and local file-write-completion timestamp (an operational retrieval-time proxy). Cover and first contents page reviewed, not all 148 pages. Shared cover/title and detailed Article 6(2)/Annex III contents support section identity, not a separately verified combined full work. The review copy is local only, not a committed archive. This narrow review does not reverify the other metadata or classifications. 2026-09-06 expanded-evidence update: the independently evidenced whole consultation-work parent, official part_of edge, publication-date citations, complete classification/role evidence, audited body-supported sector locators and retained official receipts now complete this section's historical-readiness review without inferring a numbered communication or altering the prior personal review credit.
- Review status
- verified
Relationships
-
Draft Annex III high-risk classification guidelines · Related to · Draft high-risk classification guidelines — General principles
Analytical relationship · Verified
Research assessment rationale: The Commission landing page presents this file and the General-principles file as sibling sections of one draft guideline, not versions or annexes of the General-principles file; related_to records association only and does not establish parent readiness.
Verification
- Expanded evidence review
- Verified
- Reviewed by
- Yichen Hao
- Evidence review date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00Z
The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions
- Last verified: 2026-09-05T08:20:53Z · AI-assisted reviewer retrieved this official download with normal TLS verification. The 1547742-byte response is a 148-page PDF, confirmed by PDF signature, Poppler and pypdf despite the malformed HTTP Content-Type value '/'. SHA-256: b1df0ffb30310e126c7e060e03c9b5aab97c0a2ab61a2f3e3e00ede3655e2792. retrieved_at uses observed UTC local file-write completion immediately following download as an operational retrieval-time proxy; it does not claim precise HTTP timing and is not the publication date. Cover and first contents page reviewed, not all 148 pages. Shared cover/title and detailed Article 6(2)/Annex III contents support section identity, not a separately verified combined full work. Original bytes exist only in a local ignored review directory; no committed archive is claimed. Exact observation limits and timestamps are recorded in research/migrations/2026-09-05-official-pdf-evidence.json.
- Last verified: 2026-09-05T08:20:53Z · Official page published 19 May 2026 provides three separate consultation-draft files: general principles, Annex I and Annex III guidance (newsroom documents 128559, 128560 and 128561). These downloads are presented as drafts; this bounded review does not establish the absence of every possible final successor. Narrow verification on 2026-09-05 checked the landing-page structure, stated purposes and download labels recorded in research/migrations/2026-09-05-relationship-evidence-migration.json; linked binary file interiors and retained bytes were not verified in this review, and no source snapshot was retained. Follow-up by AI-assisted reviewer at 2026-09-05T08:20:53Z: actual linked PDF bytes were retrieved and narrowly inspected; individual source records, checksums, selected page locators and local-only retention are recorded in research/migrations/2026-09-05-official-pdf-evidence.json. This supplements the earlier landing-page review; it is not a full-field or all-page re-verification, and unresolved relationship holds remain.