Published document record

GPAI Code model documentation form

Official metadata

Official title
General-Purpose AI Code of Practice — Model Documentation Form
Document type
Template
Document date
2025-07-10
Document date kind
Publication
Document-date evidence
European Commission · Final-Code page statement 'published on 10 July 2025' and 'Model Documentation Form' download 118118; DOCX identifies the Transparency Chapter form. — Establishes 2025-07-10 as this exact record's publication-based document date.
Publication date
2025-07-10
Publication-date evidence
European Commission · Final-Code page statement 'published on 10 July 2025' beside Model Documentation Form 118118. — Establishes 2025-07-10 as first official publication for this exact version or release.
Version label
Final form
Legal status
Non binding
Language
en

Research classifications

These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.

Record level
Supporting
Version status
Final
Temporal collection
Contemporary EU AI policy
Relevance class
Direct AI relevance
Policy stage
Implementation
Corpus tier
Core
Sectors
  • General cross sector
  • Intellectual property
Policy membership
  • AI Act implementation
  • EU AI policy pathway
  • GPAI Code

Classification evidence

  • Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Commission · Exact Transparency/model-documentation artifact 'General-Purpose AI Code of Practice — Model Documentation Form': named commitments, measures or form fields implementing GPAI transparency, copyright or systemic-risk obligations. — The artifact directly governs, interprets, evaluates or operationalises EU artificial-intelligence policy rather than merely mentioning AI.
  • Sector tags: General cross sector · European Commission · Commission download 118118 (DOCX), 'Model Documentation Form': opening explanatory paragraph beginning 'This Form includes all the information', referencing Measure 1.1 of the final Transparency Chapter and defining downstream providers integrating GPAI models into AI systems; AIO/NCAs/DPs recipient legend. Paragraph anchors refer to the retained form, not rendered page numbers. — The retained general_cross_sector tag is supported by the artifact's horizontal AI-policy scope.
  • Provenance tags: Officially published · European Commission · Final-Code page statement 'published on 10 July 2025' beside Model Documentation Form 118118. — The exact version is distributed through an official EU institutional endpoint.
  • Sector tags: Intellectual property · European Commission · Model Documentation Form, official DOCX 118118, 'Methods of distribution and licenses', 'License' rows; extracted paragraphs 293-310. — Requires documentation of model licences and restrictions on use, modification and redistribution.

Production provenance

Provenance tags
  • Officially published
Named bibliographic authors
  • Nuria Oliver · European Commission · Commission final-Code page states that the Transparency Chapter includes the Model Documentation Form; the exact linked Transparency Chapter PDF cover names Nuria Oliver and Rishi Bommasani as its authors.
  • Rishi Bommasani · European Commission · Commission final-Code page states that the Transparency Chapter includes the Model Documentation Form; the exact linked Transparency Chapter PDF cover names Nuria Oliver and Rishi Bommasani as its authors.
Institutions and roles
  • European AI Office · Commissioner · role evidence · Official Commission page expressly says the AI Office appointed the chairs and vice-chairs leading drafting.

Official sources and identifiers

Research assessment

Inclusion rationale
Verified official English text within the AI Act implementation and amendment corpus.
Researcher notes
Official metadata is transcribed from the cited source; corpus tier and policy-stage classification are researcher assessments. On 2026-09-05, AI-assisted reviewer editorially corrected record_level from attachment to supporting because the Commission landing page states that the model-documentation form supports the Transparency chapter; stronger structural claims about the uninspected binary were not verified. Later expanded evidence review by AI-assisted reviewer opened and read exact DOCX 118118: the form headings and fields were inspected, and the final-Code page was checked for its statement that the Transparency Chapter includes the Model Documentation Form. The linked Transparency Chapter cover, not an unsupported host inference, supplies the two named chapter-author credits.
Review status
verified

Relationships

Verification

Expanded evidence review
Verified
Reviewed by
Yichen Hao
Evidence review date
2026-09-05T18:11:15Z

The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions

  • Last verified: 2026-09-05T17:58:09Z · Live official-page review on 5 September 2026. The Commission page names the thirteen chairs and vice-chairs leading the GPAI Code drafting process and expressly states that the AI Office appointed them; it is used for named external-author and commissioning evidence, not as evidence that the Commission or AI Office authored the Code.
  • Last verified: 2026-09-05T18:11:15Z · Official Commission page publishes the final GPAI Code and separate Transparency, Copyright, Safety and Security, Model Documentation Form and Signatory Form files (newsroom documents 118120, 118115, 118119, 118118, 118312). Narrow verification on 2026-09-05 checked the landing-page structure, stated purposes and download labels recorded in research/migrations/2026-09-05-relationship-evidence-migration.json; linked binary file interiors and retained bytes were not verified in this review, and no source snapshot was retained. Live re-review by AI-assisted reviewer on 5 September 2026 checked the official endpoint and exact-version identity, substantive scope, relevant dates and institutional attribution; prior verification history and retrieved_at are retained. Follow-up clarification: in this later expanded review, AI-assisted reviewer opened and read DOCX 118118 and checked its headings and substantive documentation fields. The earlier sentence about uninspected binaries is preserved as historical scope for the earlier narrow review, not a description of this later pass.

Return to the Corpus