Published document record
AI in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
PDF source copies
These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.
Official PDF — unmodified source copy
If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.
Download PDF — 17 pages (2.17 MB)P9_TA(2021)0238. English PDF, 17 pages. Official publication edition corresponding to this record.
Source: European Parliament. Retrieved 2026-09-10.
Copy provenance and reuse
Unmodified official document. Source attribution and original notices are retained. EUR-Lex permits reuse of legal documents unless a specific restriction applies; this copy is not relicensed as database metadata. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.
SHA-256:
68f108f904571c9bed6aa1ec2d60e88f903af19130e3bb8c936a3df40618bf8e
Official metadata
- Official title
- European Parliament resolution of 19 May 2021 on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (2020/2017(INI))
- Official reference
- P9_TA(2021)0238
- Document type
- Resolution
- Document date
- 2021-05-19
- Document date kind
- Institutional adoption
- Document-date evidence
- Publications Office of the European Union · Resolution heading — Institutional adoption date of this text.
- Publication date
- 2022-01-12
- Publication-date evidence
- Publications Office of the European Union · Official Journal identity block and masthead — OJ C 15, p. 28, opened OJ-addressed EUR-Lex text.
- Version label
- Adopted resolution, Official Journal manifestation
- Legal status
- Non binding
- Language
- en
Research classifications
These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.
- Record level
- Principal
- Version status
- Final
- Temporal collection
- Contemporary EU AI policy
- Relevance class
- Direct AI relevance
- Policy stage
- Adoption
- Corpus tier
- Directly related
- Sectors
- Policy membership
Classification evidence
- Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · Publications Office of the European Union · Paragraphs 1–7 and 73–74 — AI is the substantive policy subject of this document.
- Sector tags: Education · Publications Office of the European Union · Recitals Q–R and paragraphs 1–7 — Sets education-specific AI safeguards.
- Sector tags: Media and culture · Publications Office of the European Union · Paragraphs 73–74 — Addresses AI-generated cultural content and creative-sector impacts.
- Sector tags: Intellectual property · Publications Office of the European Union · Paragraphs 73–74 — Requests assessment of authorship and remuneration under IPR.
- Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · Publications Office of the European Union · Resolution heading and acting body — The Parliament is the acting institution in its resolution.
- Provenance tags: Officially published · Publications Office of the European Union · Official Journal identity block — Official publication and this English manifestation are evidenced.
Production provenance
- Provenance tags
- Named bibliographic authors
- None recorded after review
- Institutions and roles
-
- European Parliament · Adopter · role evidence · Resolution heading
- European Parliament · Author · role evidence · Resolution heading and acting body: The European Parliament
- Publications Office of the European Union · Official host · role evidence · EUR-Lex official English manifestation
- Publications Office of the European Union · Publisher · role evidence · Official Journal masthead
Official sources and identifiers
- CELEX
- 52021IP0238
- OJ reference
- 2022/C 15/04
- Official source · Publisher/host: Publications Office of the European Union
Formal procedure
Official procedure reference:
- 2020/2017(INI)
Research assessment
- Inclusion rationale
- Dedicated sectoral AI resolution requiring fundamental-rights, cultural-diversity and intellectual-property safeguards and addressing dataset bias.
- Researcher notes
- The OJ-addressed manifestation expressly identifies P9_TA(2021)0238 and CELEX 52021IP0238. It is the same adopted resolution, not another version.
- Review status
- verified
Relationships
-
Committee report on AI in education, culture and audiovisual media · Procedural step for · AI in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
Official relationship · Verified
Official rationale: The official report page separately lists this committee report under Texts tabled and the linked plenary resolution under Texts adopted. This does not assert identical text.
Verification
- Expanded evidence review
- Verified
- Reviewed by
- Yichen Hao
- Evidence review date
- 2026-09-06T00:41:49.332+01:00
The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions
- Last verified: 2026-09-06T00:41:49.332+01:00 · English primary text reopened on 6 September 2026 (Europe/London). Reviewed Paragraphs 1–7 and 73–74; identity and attribution checked. The OJ-addressed manifestation expressly identifies P9_TA(2021)0238 and CELEX 52021IP0238. It is the same adopted resolution, not another version.