Published document record
Commission opinion on the Transparency Code
PDF source copies
These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.
Official PDF — unmodified source copy
If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.
Download PDF — 12 pages (0.14 MB)Exact C(2026) 4839 final Commission Opinion of 8 July 2026, newsroom document 130913. Complete 12-page PDF (cover plus 11 numbered pages).
Source: European Commission. Retrieved 2026-09-10.
Copy provenance and reuse
Approved for unmodified whole-document reuse with European Commission attribution under the Commission legal notice's CC BY 4.0 default for EU-owned website content. Indicate any changes. Institutional marks remain only as integral parts of the source document; this does not license separate logo use or imply endorsement. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.
SHA-256:
e9b85373cde28a6081fab307fa17fa4c90c2560a1c9a145fb461f696bca424ce
Official metadata
- Official title
- Commission Opinion on the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content
- Official reference
- C(2026) 4839 final
- Document type
- Opinion
- Document date
- 2026-07-08
- Document date kind
- Document issue
- Document-date evidence
- European Commission · Opinion masthead: 'Brussels, 8.7.2026' and 'C(2026) 4839 final' in Commission Opinion PDF 130913. — Establishes 2026-07-08 as this exact record's document issue date.
- Publication date
- 2026-07-09
- Publication-date evidence
- European Commission · Commission library page metadata field 'Publication 09 July 2026', distinct from the 8 July PDF masthead, beside 'Commission Opinion' download 130913. — Establishes 2026-07-09 as first official publication for this exact version or release.
- Version label
- Final opinion
- Legal status
- Non binding
- Language
- en
Research classifications
These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.
- Record level
- Supporting
- Version status
- Final
- Temporal collection
- Contemporary EU AI policy
- Relevance class
- Direct AI relevance
- Policy stage
- Implementation
- Corpus tier
- Core
- Sectors
- Policy membership
Classification evidence
- Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Commission · Exact 'Commission Opinion on the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content': recitals, assessment and operative conclusion on the relevant AI Act Code's adequacy. — The artifact directly governs, interprets, evaluates or operationalises EU artificial-intelligence policy rather than merely mentioning AI.
- Sector tags: General cross sector · European Commission · Exact 'Commission Opinion on the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content': recitals, assessment and operative conclusion on the relevant AI Act Code's adequacy. The cited scope applies horizontally to AI systems, models, providers, deployers or affected persons rather than one economic sector. — The retained general_cross_sector tag is supported by the artifact's horizontal AI-policy scope.
- Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · European Commission · Opinion masthead: 'Brussels, 8.7.2026' and 'C(2026) 4839 final' in Commission Opinion PDF 130913. — The exact institutional artifact supports the retained EU-institution provenance classification.
- Provenance tags: Officially published · European Commission · Commission library page metadata field 'Publication 09 July 2026', distinct from the 8 July PDF masthead, beside 'Commission Opinion' download 130913. — The exact version is distributed through an official EU institutional endpoint.
Production provenance
- Provenance tags
- Named bibliographic authors
- None recorded after review
- Institutions and roles
-
- European Commission · Author · role evidence · Opinion masthead: 'Brussels, 8.7.2026' and 'C(2026) 4839 final' in Commission Opinion PDF 130913.
Official sources and identifiers
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Commission
Research assessment
- Inclusion rationale
- Verified official English text within the AI Act implementation and amendment corpus.
- Researcher notes
- Official metadata is transcribed from the cited source; corpus tier and policy-stage classification are researcher assessments.
- Review status
- verified
Relationships
-
Commission opinion on the Transparency Code · Endorses · AI-generated-content transparency code
Official relationship · Verified
Official rationale: The Commission opinion assesses the code as adequate for demonstrating compliance with relevant Article 50 obligations.
Verification
- Expanded evidence review
- Verified
- Reviewed by
- Yichen Hao
- Evidence review date
- 2026-09-05T18:07:46Z
The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions
- Last verified: 2026-09-05T17:58:09Z · Official page published 9 July 2026 provides the Commission opinion dated 8 July and AI Board assessment dated 9 July (newsroom documents 130913 and 130916). Live re-review by AI-assisted reviewer on 5 September 2026 checked the official endpoint and exact-version identity, substantive scope, relevant dates and institutional attribution; prior verification history and retrieved_at are retained.