Published document record
Ethical Aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems
Official metadata
- Official title
- Ethical Aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems
- Official reference
- PE 563.501; EPRS_STU(2016)563501
- Document type
- Study
- Document date
- 2016-06-28
- Document date kind
- Publication
- Document-date evidence
- European Parliament · PDF page 8, Ethical Aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems entry, Date 28-06-2016 — Exact official publication used because the study states only June 2016.
- Publication date
- 2016-06-28
- Publication-date evidence
- European Parliament · PDF page 8, Ethical Aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems entry, Date 28-06-2016 — Official catalogue identifies publication on 28 June 2016.
- Additional official dates
- Manuscript completion: 2016-06 (month) · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2, manuscript completion
- Version label
- Final published text
- Legal status
- Non binding
- Legal-status evidence
- European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2, disclaimer — Research study; opinions need not represent Parliament's official position.
- Language
- en
Research classifications
These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.
- Record level
- Principal
- Version status
- Final
- Temporal collection
- Historical lineage
- Relevance class
- Direct AI relevance
- Policy stage
- Agenda setting
- Corpus tier
- Directly related
- Sectors
- Policy membership
Classification evidence
- Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 3, Abstract; pp. 27–42 — Explicit AI impacts and anticipatory legal analysis satisfy the direct-first rule.
- Sector tags: Research and innovation · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed pp. 3–6 — Scientific foresight evaluates emerging AI systems.
- Sector tags: Justice · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed pp. 27–42, legal backcasting — Analyses prospective legal responsibilities and protections.
- Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2, compilation credit — The main synthesis credits named Parliament research-service compilers.
- Provenance tags: EU commissioned external · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2, project and expert credits — STOA requested the project; Technopolis conducted its main research phases.
- Provenance tags: Officially published · European Parliament · Matching study catalogue entry — Official dated publication record.
Production provenance
- Provenance tags
- Named bibliographic authors
- Lieve Van Woensel · Scientific Foresight Unit, DG EPRS, European Parliament · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2: document compilers
- Christian Kurrer · Scientific Foresight Unit, DG EPRS, European Parliament · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2: document compilers
- Mihalis Kritikos · Scientific Foresight Unit, DG EPRS, European Parliament · European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service · Printed p. 2: document compilers
- Institutions and roles
-
- European Parliament · Author · role evidence · Printed p. 2: three DG EPRS compilers
- European Parliament · Commissioner · role evidence · Printed p. 2: requested by Parliament's STOA Panel
- European Parliament · Official host · role evidence · European Parliament RegData English publication
- European Parliament · Publisher · role evidence · Cover: EPRS; printed p. 2, editor and copyright
Official sources and identifiers
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Parliament
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Parliament
- Official source · Publisher/host: European Parliament / European Parliamentary Research Service
Research assessment
- Inclusion rationale
- Substantive AI policy content verified in the cited primary English text.
- Researcher notes
- Main compilation is distinct from its Annex and Annex 1; no separate annex records admitted. Printed p. 2 also credits assistance by Brian Kelly, Philip Boucher, Sarah McCormack and Rachel Manirambona (DG EPRS). External phase coordination: Christien Enzing, Chiel Scholten and Joost van Barneveld (Technopolis Group). Phase 1 experts: Adriana Tapus (ENSTA-ParisTech), Michael Henshaw (Loughborough University), Bram Vanderborght (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Eldert J. van Henten (Wageningen University), Fred van Houten (University of Twente), Stamatis Karnouskos (SAP), Haydn Thompson (Haydn Consulting). Phase 2 experts: Tsjalling Swierstra, Tamar Sharon, Ike Kamphof (Maastricht University). Phase 3: Mihalis Kritikos (DG EPRS). These are project contribution credits, not an undifferentiated main-author list.
- Review status
- verified
Relationships
No additional published relationships touch this record.
Verification
- Expanded evidence review
- Verified
- Reviewed by
- Yichen Hao
- Evidence review date
- 2026-09-05T23:45:09Z
The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions
- Last verified: 2026-09-05T23:45:09Z · Official indexed Think Tank catalogue: Study, 28-06-2016; main Study distinguished from Annex and Annex 1. Direct HTML open failed; date independently checked in official PDF catalogue.
- Last verified: 2026-09-05T23:45:09Z · Official catalogue PDF opened, PDF page 8: matching study title, linked study manifestation, summary, and publication date 28-06-2016; Annex and Annex 1 listed separately.
- Last verified: 2026-09-05T23:45:09Z · Full 48-page English study opened. Printed pp. 2–3 establish credits, issue month, disclaimer and scope; pp. 27–42 provide legal analysis.