EU AI Policy Observatory

Published document record

Fundamental rights implications of big data

PDF source copies

These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.

  • Official PDF — unmodified source copy

    If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.

    Download PDF — 10 pages (0.20 MB)

    Exact English P8_TA(2017)0076 adopted resolution, 14 March 2017, fundamental-rights implications of big data, 2016/2225(INI). Complete recitals and paragraphs 1-33, final transmission paragraph on 10; all ten pages visually inspected.

    Source: European Parliament. Retrieved 2026-09-10.

    Copy provenance and reuse

    Official retrieval location.

    Unmodified European Parliament publication retained with source attribution under the Parliament legal notice. No publication-specific contrary reuse notice was identified; this copy is not an authentic enacted Official Journal text. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.

    SHA-256: 88636af55e1fed95bfa3a6ebe7be6c23e73d282bf56d11ca899a14b30f07cea6

Official metadata

Official title
European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2017 on fundamental rights implications of big data: privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, security and law-enforcement (2016/2225(INI))
Official reference
P8_TA(2017)0076
Document type
Resolution
Document date
2017-03-14
Document date kind
Institutional adoption
Document-date evidence
European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — The cited official manifestation establishes the document date 2017-03-14 and its stated meaning.
Publication date
2018-07-25
Publication-date evidence
Publications Office of the European Union · Identity block and OJ C 263, 25.7.2018, pages 82-89 — The cited official manifestation establishes official publication on 2018-07-25.
Additional official dates
  • Parliament adopted text manifestation: 2017-03-14 (day) · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32
Version label
Adopted text and Official Journal manifestation
Legal status
Non binding
Language
en

Research classifications

These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.

Record level
Principal
Version status
Final
Temporal collection
Historical lineage
Relevance class
Direct AI relevance
Policy stage
Adoption
Corpus tier
Directly related
Sectors
  • General cross sector
  • Law enforcement
  • Justice
  • Public administration
  • Consumer protection
  • Media and culture
  • Competition and markets
Policy membership

    Classification evidence

    • Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Recital B identifies AI training, and paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 make substantive policy requests on algorithmic transparency, bias, automated decision-making, profiling and human intervention. Direct AI substance therefore applies before indirect legal context.
    • Sector tags: General cross sector · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Recitals F-G and the general considerations address horizontal effects of big-data and algorithmic systems across public and private sectors.
    • Sector tags: Justice · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — The resolution is framed around enforceable fundamental rights, data-protection safeguards and judicial redress for automated processing.
    • Sector tags: Law enforcement · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Paragraphs 25-32 are a dedicated law-enforcement section covering profiling, automated decisions, predictive policing, discrimination and human accountability.
    • Sector tags: Consumer protection · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Recitals K and R and paragraph 9 connect algorithmic processing with consumer rights and consumer-protection regulators.
    • Sector tags: Competition and markets · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Recitals K and R address market concentration, mergers, fair competition and cooperation with competition regulators.
    • Sector tags: Public administration · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Paragraphs 8 and 15 apply algorithmic accountability and system security requirements to the public sector and e-government.
    • Sector tags: Media and culture · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — Recital O and paragraph 13 address algorithmic effects on information access, media freedom and pluralism.
    • Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · European Parliament · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32 — The official text is expressly a European Parliament resolution and names Parliament as the acting body.
    • Provenance tags: Officially published · Publications Office of the European Union · Identity block and OJ C 263, 25.7.2018, pages 82-89 — EUR-Lex identifies CELEX 52017IP0076 and OJ C 263, 25 July 2018, pages 82-89.

    Production provenance

    Provenance tags
    • Authored by an EU institution
    • Officially published
    Named bibliographic authors
    None recorded after review
    Institutions and roles

    Official sources and identifiers

    CELEX
    52017IP0076
    OJ reference
    OJ C 263, 25.7.2018, pp. 82-89

    Formal procedure

    Official procedure reference:

    • 2016/2225(INI)

    Research assessment

    Inclusion rationale
    The official adopted text and EUR-Lex OJ manifestation verify identity, dates and material AI/algorithmic policy passages. Although the title is broader than AI, the dedicated provisions on AI training, algorithmic bias, automated decisions and human accountability satisfy the direct-AI-first rule. The 2018 OJ reproduction is not a new contemporary document.
    Researcher notes
    Historical collection and corpus classifications are AI-assisted researcher assessments, separate from official metadata.
    Review status
    verified

    Relationships

    No additional published relationships touch this record.

    Verification

    Expanded evidence review
    Verified
    Reviewed by
    Yichen Hao
    Evidence review date
    2026-09-05T06:28:17.769Z

    The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions

    • Last verified: 2026-09-05T06:28:17.769Z · Identity block and OJ C 263, 25.7.2018, pages 82-89: EUR-Lex verifies the title, CELEX and OJ references and the later OJ publication date for the same resolution.
    • Last verified: 2026-09-05T06:28:17.769Z · Header, recitals B and M-N, paragraphs 8, 19-21 and 25-32: The adopted text verifies the 14 March 2017 identity and contains dedicated provisions on AI training, algorithmic bias and transparency, automated decisions and human accountability.

    Return to the Corpus