EU AI Policy Observatory

Published document record

Report on AI safety and liability implications

PDF source copies

These PDFs are hosted here for continued access. Each is labelled as an unmodified official PDF or a converted reading copy. They are saved copies, not a live statement of the latest law or institutional endorsement. Official source links remain below.

  • Official PDF — unmodified source copy

    If the PDF does not display in your browser, Open PDF in a new tab or download it below. Both use the copy hosted on this site.

    Download PDF — 18 pages (0.55 MB)

    COM(2020) 64 final. English PDF, 18 pages. Official publication edition corresponding to this record.

    Source: European Commission. Retrieved 2026-09-10.

    Copy provenance and reuse

    Official retrieval location.

    Unmodified official document. Source attribution and original notices are retained. EUR-Lex permits reuse of legal documents unless a specific restriction applies; this copy is not relicensed as database metadata. Source reuse terms. The database metadata licence does not replace these terms.

    SHA-256: 3a4fbda9a0c6e2c482088777506d2261a08bca539a61a237992e2160f7f2e019

Official metadata

Official title
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE Report on the safety and liability implications of Artificial Intelligence, the Internet of Things and robotics
Official reference
COM(2020) 64 final
Document type
Report
Document date
2020-02-19
Document date kind
Document issue
Document-date evidence
European Commission / EUR-Lex · EUR-Lex Document information > Date of document and Date of dispatch: 19/02/2020; COM(2020) 64 final Brussels masthead carries the same date. — Establishes retained issue date 2020-02-19.
Publication date
2020-02-19
Publication-date evidence
European Commission · Exact report heading, field 'Publication date 19 February 2020', and dated English download. — Establishes retained publication date 2020-02-19 separately from issue/dispatch.
Version label
Final
Legal status
Non binding
Language
en

Research classifications

These are researcher classifications used to organise and analyse the corpus; they are not official EU metadata.

Record level
Principal
Version status
Final
Temporal collection
Contemporary EU AI policy
Relevance class
Direct AI relevance
Policy stage
Consultation
Corpus tier
Core
Sectors
  • General cross sector
  • Health
  • Financial services
  • Transport and mobility
  • Consumer protection
  • Industry and manufacturing
  • Agriculture and environment
  • Critical infrastructure
  • Cybersecurity
Policy membership
  • Coordinated European AI strategy
  • EU AI policy pathway

Classification evidence

  • Relevance class: Direct AI relevance · European Commission / EUR-Lex · Official COM(2020) 64 final: sections 2-4 analyze safety and liability for AI, IoT and robotics across products, services, businesses, consumers and public uses. — The cited provisions make AI the central subject.
  • Sector tags: General cross sector · European Commission / EUR-Lex · Official COM(2020) 64 final: sections 2-4 analyze safety and liability for AI, IoT and robotics across products, services, businesses, consumers and public uses. — The cited provisions substantiate the retained cross-sector classification.
  • Provenance tags: Authored by an EU institution · European Commission / EUR-Lex · EUR-Lex Document information > Author: European Commission; COM(2020) 64 final masthead reads EUROPEAN COMMISSION. — Exact official metadata identifies the responsible EU institution or body.
  • Provenance tags: Officially published · European Commission · Exact report heading, field 'Publication date 19 February 2020', and dated English download. — The official Commission publication page independently dates and identifies the exact record.
  • Sector tags: Consumer protection · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 1.1, printed p.1 / PDF p.2; section 3, printed pp.12-16 / PDF pp.13-17. — Analyses consumer protection, compensation and evidential obstacles in claims involving AI-enabled products; discussion of possible reforms is not presented as enacted law.
  • Sector tags: Health · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 2, printed p.8 / PDF p.9, mental-health and elderly-care robot discussion. — Analyses mental-health risks from humanoid AI systems, including care settings, and considers specific producer obligations.
  • Sector tags: Transport and mobility · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 3, printed pp.13-16 / PDF pp.14-17. — Analyses autonomous vehicles, mixed automated/traditional traffic and AI traffic-management liability, rather than inferring transport scope solely from motor insurance.
  • Sector tags: Financial services · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 3, printed pp.12-13 and 16 / PDF pp.13-14 and 17. — Substantively examines motor liability insurance for autonomous vehicles and possible insurance obligations for AI-specific risk profiles; not a generic reference to compensation amounts.
  • Sector tags: Cybersecurity · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 2, printed pp.5-6 / PDF pp.6-7; section 3, printed pp.14-15 / PDF pp.15-16. — Analyses connected-system attacks, cybersecurity requirements and liability for security weaknesses in AI/IoT products.
  • Sector tags: Agriculture and environment · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 2, printed pp.8-9 / PDF pp.9-10, fruit-picking robot example. — Uses agricultural robots as a worked example of how faulty AI datasets can cause physical injury and motivate safety requirements. The agricultural dimension supports this combined label.
  • Sector tags: Industry and manufacturing · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 2, printed pp.5 and 10-11 / PDF pp.6 and 11-12. — Examines industrial control-system safety and machinery/software integration in the AI product-safety and supply-chain analysis.
  • Sector tags: Critical infrastructure · European Commission / EUR-Lex · COM(2020) 64 final, section 3, printed p.16 / PDF p.17, specific-risk-profile discussion. — Explicitly includes AI management of power distribution and traffic-management services in the analysis motivating possible risk-based liability.

Production provenance

Provenance tags
  • Authored by an EU institution
  • Officially published
Named bibliographic authors
None recorded after review
Institutions and roles
  • European Commission · Author · role evidence · EUR-Lex Document information > Author: European Commission; COM(2020) 64 final masthead reads EUROPEAN COMMISSION.

Official sources and identifiers

CELEX
52020DC0064

Research assessment

Inclusion rationale
Published alongside the AI White Paper, the report frames the safety and liability problems that inform subsequent regulatory choices.
Researcher notes
Analytical selection, separate from the official EUR-Lex metadata.
Review status
verified

Relationships

No additional published relationships touch this record.

Verification

Expanded evidence review
Verified
Reviewed by
Yichen Hao
Evidence review date
2026-09-05T18:06:34Z

The evidence review date is not a separate human sign-off date. Review credit and evidence-review actions

  • Last verified: 2026-09-05T17:43:48Z · Official Commission publication page identifies the exact safety/liability report, gives publication date 19 February 2020, and supplies a dated English download.
  • Last verified: 2026-09-04T00:00:00Z · EUR-Lex English record confirms the report title, COM(2020) 64 final, CELEX 52020DC0064 and document date 19 February 2020.

Return to the Corpus